Assalam o Alikum, My point in this regard is very clear that is
If Tablighi jamaat is wrong because of being
1. Ashari-Maturidi in dilactic (95 % of total Muslim scholars) 2. Soofi (Good percentage among Muslims) 3. Hanafi (51% of total Muslim) 4. Follower of rest 3 Imam (43% of Muslims)
(All percentage is approx and among sunni Muslims (other than shias)
Then those who are criticising Tablighi Jamaat should ask from 1. Yusuf ASl Qrdhavi (openly declaring him as Ashari) 2. Mufti Taqi Usmani (Openly accepting him as Ashari-Maturidi, Hanafi, Soofi) 3. Maulana Abul Hasan Ali Nadvi Rahimullah (Open accepting as Ashari-Maturidi, Hanafi Soofi)
Used to sit with Abdullah ibne Baaz Rahimullah in islamic meetings on the stage at Makkah Mukarrama.
He was given twice the key of Kaba to enter it and to lead the dua inside kaba.
Abul Hasan Ali Nadvi Rahimullah has written at least three book in support of Tablighi Jamaat and many article. He has patronised Tablighi jamaat till end of his life.
(So if Tablighi jamaat is promoting shirk as claimed in the book on your website. How does a person who was patron of it was given such chance islamic leadership
with a chance to enter Kaba and to sit with a person of tawheed like Abdullah ibne Baaz Rahimullah)
Mufti Taqi Usmani
Permanent Member, International Islamic Fiqh Academy, Jeddah, sponsored by OIC.
• Member, Islamic Fiqh Academy of Rabita-al-‘Alam-e-Islami, Makkah
So My point is very simple.
Is it not a double standard and victimization to tablighi jamaat as it has no publication division and a policy to counter the allegations against it.
Your Second Point
As per your second point that indicate that you met the scholars and tried to raise your issue and could not get the favorable response. This answer raised more question than any answer.
Lets understand this with an an example.
You have given a Definition of Taqlid By Allamah Imam Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan on your website. He was an Aalim I respect him but
if you see the Fatwa of Imam e Haram shaykh Abdullah as subail you will find totally different definition of Taqleed ( For your reference I am giving below its urdu translation and link of arabic letter.)
Reference for Imam e Haram shaykh Abdullah as subail Fatwa on this link
So my point is that either
1.you should accept the difference of opinion of scholar and should tell it to general public or
2. Else you should criticse all instead of selective criticism of few and sparing others that will be double standard and victimization.
I dont consider anyone including Tablighi jamaat free from error. I simply want natural justice that all human being should seek. As for tablighi jamaat leadership they dont enter in any polemic debate.
Assalam o Alikum,
ReplyDeleteMy point in this regard is very clear that is
If Tablighi jamaat is wrong because of being
1. Ashari-Maturidi in dilactic (95 % of total Muslim scholars)
2. Soofi (Good percentage among Muslims)
3. Hanafi (51% of total Muslim)
4. Follower of rest 3 Imam (43% of Muslims)
(All percentage is approx and among sunni Muslims (other than shias)
Then those who are criticising Tablighi Jamaat should ask from
1. Yusuf ASl Qrdhavi (openly declaring him as Ashari)
2. Mufti Taqi Usmani (Openly accepting him as Ashari-Maturidi, Hanafi, Soofi)
3. Maulana Abul Hasan Ali Nadvi Rahimullah (Open accepting as Ashari-Maturidi, Hanafi Soofi)
4. Maulana Rabey Hasni Nadvi (Open accepting as Ashari-Maturidi, Hanafi Soofi)
This Abul Hasan Ali Nadvi Rahimullah
was given Faisal Award
Used to sit with Abdullah ibne Baaz Rahimullah in islamic meetings on the stage at Makkah Mukarrama.
He was given twice the key of Kaba to enter it and to lead the dua inside kaba.
Abul Hasan Ali Nadvi Rahimullah has written at least three book in support of Tablighi Jamaat and many article. He has patronised Tablighi jamaat till end of his life.
(So if Tablighi jamaat is promoting shirk as claimed in the book on your website. How does a person who was patron of it was given such chance islamic leadership
with a chance to enter Kaba and to sit with a person of tawheed like Abdullah ibne Baaz Rahimullah)
Mufti Taqi Usmani
Permanent Member, International Islamic Fiqh Academy, Jeddah, sponsored by OIC.
• Member, Islamic Fiqh Academy of Rabita-al-‘Alam-e-Islami, Makkah
So My point is very simple.
Is it not a double standard and victimization to tablighi jamaat as it has no publication division and a policy to counter the allegations against it.
Your Second Point
As per your second point that indicate that you met the scholars and tried to raise your issue and could not get the favorable response. This answer raised more question than any answer.
Lets understand this with an an example.
You have given a Definition of Taqlid By Allamah Imam Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan on your website. He was an Aalim I respect him but
if you see the Fatwa of Imam e Haram shaykh Abdullah as subail you will find totally different definition of Taqleed ( For your reference I am giving below its urdu translation and link of arabic letter.)
Reference for Imam e Haram shaykh Abdullah as subail Fatwa on this link
So my point is that either
1.you should accept the difference of opinion of scholar and should tell it to general public or
2. Else you should criticse all instead of selective criticism of few and sparing others that will be double standard and victimization.
I dont consider anyone including Tablighi jamaat free from error. I simply want natural justice that all human being should seek. As for tablighi jamaat leadership they dont enter in any polemic debate.
Jazakallah